Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Freaks and Geeks


Chesney Olson
Mr. Reints
Sociology
14 January 2020
Freaks and Geeks Blog
            Throughout the pilot episode, we were able to meet several different groups of people. There were the geeks, who were the smart yet awkward students; the freaks, who were interested in much different things than what most others were, and they tended not to care about very much; the athletes, who were obviously the kids involved in sports and were good at them; the rich, popular, who were kids who came from families with a lot of money; the adults, who were the parents, teachers, coaches, etc.; and then there were some people who were kind of in between different groups. There was definitely some things that caused dysfunction between the groups because in our world, all different kinds of people are bound to interact with one another, a lot of times causing conflict. For example, throughout the entire episode, the little boy (brother of Lindsey) that was considered a geek was constantly bullied by a boy of the (what I considered) freak group. The freak chose to bully the geek because, well, he was a geek. The freak recognizes the differences between him and the geek, and instead of accepting these differences, he decided to dislike them and turn it into a bullying situation. Another example involved Lindsey. She was probably at first part of the geek category because throughout we learned that she had been a mathlete and got good grades. She also was a part of the rich category because we also learned throughout the episode that her parents had a good amount of money. However, she was interested in a boy (or possibly boys) of the freak category. Because of this, she was willing to drop some aspects of her function that she was used to and good at in order to join the freak function. This caused dysfunction in both the freak and geek categories. Some of the freaks were not able to accept this new person into their function because she was so different from them. Likewise, the geeks were a bit shaken because one of their own had basically just given up on them and all that they believed in. Lindsey decided not to join the mathletes, skipped class, and grades may be slipping. There were several other examples throughout the show that suggested dysfunction between the groups because certain people were not willing to accept others or someone was trying to fit in a place where they did not belong.
            In this episode, power is somewhat distributed between different groups for different reasons. The freaks had power over the geeks because they obviously had more confidence, while the geeks were very weak and didn’t stand up for themselves. This is why the little geek boy is able to get bullied by a freak because the freak has power over the geek. This is somewhat the same in the situation of Lindsey. The freaks have power over her because if she does not conform to the ways of the freaks, she won’t get the boy that she likes. Obviously the adults have a good amount of power because they are older and have the responsibility of watching over the kids. The adults use this power to try and guide kids in the direction that is best for them. In almost every situation, even in this episode, the popular, rich kids have a lot of power because people think so highly of them. They have everything that others want: money and “fame”. Therefore, people are always aiming to please these popular or rich kids because they are either searching to gain something from them or are intimidated by them.
            One symbol in this episode is when one of the freaks showed Lindsey his set of drums. The set of drums not only represented a way to calm the freak, but also showed Lindsey that this boy cared about her. Showing her what makes him feel better was a way to say that he is there for her and is comfortable around her. Another symbol was the little geek’s jacket that the cheerleader gave back to him. To the geeks, it wasn’t just a kind gesture; it was an action that showed or proved that the cheerleader liked the geek because she must have remembered it was his and was thinking about him.
            These theories are definitely present in my own life. There are several functions within our school that interact. I could say that I am part of the geek function since I strive to get good grades and can be considered smart. I could also be part of the athlete function because I play several sports. This just shows that a person can be a part of several different functions. There is also conflict caused when a person of a certain function disrupts another function. For example, sometimes music events conflict with sporting events, creating dysfunction between the people of these groups. There are also a lot of symbols throughout my life as well. My friend and I have matching tatoos that symbolize our everlasting friendship. I have a special blanket that represents my home. There are small symbols like this everywhere throughout peoples' lives.



Monday, January 13, 2020

Sociological Mindfulness/Imagination


Chesney Olson
Mr. Reints
Sociology
13 January 2020
Sociological Mindfulness/Imagination
            The Ted Talk video that we watched in class, at first glance, was very intense. It talked about the aspects of empathy and having different perspectives on the very far end of the radical spectrum. In our day to day lives, we usually don’t use our minds in quite this serious mindset, especially as seniors in high school. However, this video did open my eyes to how far sociological mindfulness can go and can get you in life. The speaker walked us through examples of important events that have happened or could potentially happen in our world to people of different backgrounds. The challenge for us was to try to put ourselves in the positions of other people whom we had very little to nothing in common, and these people were in situations that were a bit difficult for our minds to even grasp. It made me realize that throughout my life, I have viewed certain situations like a mirror; all I could see was what was on my side of the situation or what was familiar to me. Instead I should have viewed situations through a window so I could have seen what was also going on the other side and tried to understand things that were unknown to me.
            Looking back, there have been several times where I have been sociologically mindful. One example is from this past weekend. A girl from Miller was very sick the first day because of a condition that she has struggled with for many years involving intense migraines. She ended up vomiting at our first rehearsal and felt extremely embarrassed about the entire incident. I understood why she felt that way because if I was in her place and that had happened to me, I would have felt the exact same way. Because of this I went over to her, gave her a hug, and explained that she had absolutely no need to feel embarrassed. She could not have done anything to avoid the situation, and everyone understood why it happened. Nobody was judging her because at some point in almost every person’s life they will have an embarrassing moment like her own that could not be avoided. I then tried to relate an incident that happened to me to what happened to her.
            Another example of showing empathy has been being a big sister figure to my 10 year old cousin Adalynn. She has had a pretty rough life as her father is absent, and her mother has been periodically unstable. Because of this, my family helped raise Adalynn through a large portion of her early life. Throughout that experience I learned a lot of patience. Adalynn has a tendency to behave poorly, and it has taken a long time to realize that a lot of her actions are not necessarily her fault. She did not choose to be born into a broken, unstable family who was probably not ready to have and care for her. I have had to learn that whenever she is acting up, I have to take a step back from the situation and think about how much of this behavior is a result of her terrible circumstances. I still struggle with understanding how to deal with some of her behaviors and to remember that a large part of why she is the way she is is not because of her.
            The first person I would add to the list of “10 acts of courage that changed the world” would definitely be Harriet Tubman. She escaped slavery and instead of running away, she stayed in the line of fire in order to save people that were in the same predicament that she had just escaped. Her act of courage freed a tremendous amount of other slaves from the clutches of cruel owners, and it also was a large contributing factor to the ending of slavery. Another person I would add to this list would be George W. Bush. He was a huge contributor in the recovery of our nation after the attacks of 9/11. His act of courage not only saved our country at that point in time, but it ensured country that we have today and its future.
            I see myself fitting into the big picture of society by showing people what it means to see through each other’s eyes and care for one another. I am extremely lucky to have the opportunity to be able to spread the message of having different perspectives on such a large stage this upcoming year. After that, I plan continue caring for people and sharing my mindset as I go through college and hopefully going through medical school to become a doctor. Being a doctor would not only give me the chance to help make people physically healthy, but also mentally healthy.

Sunday, October 6, 2019

Working Memory and Car Crashes


Chesney Olson
Mr. Reints
Psychology
10/8/19
Working Memory and Car Crashes
            We already know that adolescent drivers are the most likely to be involved in car crashes, but we usually assume it is just because of their lack of driving experience and skills. However, studies have recently shown that the causes of these crashes could be better linked to their underdeveloped or less developed working memory. The article states, “Working memory, which develops through adolescence into the twenties, is a frontal lobe process associated with complex, moment-to-moment tasks essential to driving.” There is an inverse relationship between the age and crash risk within the early years of driving. Studies conducted by researchers from the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania (APPC) and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) were the first studies directly connecting working memory to car crashes. They carried out the experiment over seven years, comparing the changes in working memory and other traits in adolescents beginning at ages 11-13 up until they were 18-20 years old. Results showed that those with less-than-average growth of working memory were much more likely to have reported a crash than those with an above average growth of working memory. Based on these findings, researchers believe that with further testing of diverse youth, they will be able to use the knowledge gained in order to predict and prevent a large number of crashes. They believe that the adolescent driver’s clinician will be able to conduct a screening by evaluating the cognitive abilities of the said adolescent and decide whether or not it is safe for him or her to drive independently. If the clinician believes he or she has average or above average working memory, the adolescent could be provided a release stating he or she can be allowed an independent driver’s permit or license. If not, researchers would like to be able to provide a type of intervention technology or extra training to young drivers who need it.



Freaks and Geeks

Chesney Olson Mr. Reints Sociology 14 January 2020 Freaks and Geeks Blog             Throughout the pilot episode, we were able ...